<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Solids Works</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dieguy.com/2010/05/01/solids-works/stephens/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dieguy.com/2010/05/01/solids-works/stephens/</link>
	<description>Official Tim Stephens Website</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 07:22:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Best Eye Glasses</title>
		<link>http://www.dieguy.com/2010/05/01/solids-works/stephens/comment-page-1/#comment-3142</link>
		<dc:creator>Best Eye Glasses</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 18:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dieguy.com/?p=745#comment-3142</guid>
		<description>This is all very new to me and this article really opened my eyes.Thanks for sharing with us your wisdom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is all very new to me and this article really opened my eyes.Thanks for sharing with us your wisdom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephens</title>
		<link>http://www.dieguy.com/2010/05/01/solids-works/stephens/comment-page-1/#comment-296</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 May 2010 15:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dieguy.com/?p=745#comment-296</guid>
		<description>hi Greg,

Great question!!

I can think of three excellent reasons to upgrade from a SolidWorks to a Catia-level modeler:

1. Major customers using Catia so you can design the tool with native product design files.

2. The need for advanced surfacing capabilities for draw die development to drive formability simulation and analysis.

3. Dies with large assemblies / high number of components.

I was tempted to add new employees with Catia experience over SolidWorks. But as Shane pointed out above, a Catia user can be up to speed on SolidWorks in less than a day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi Greg,</p>
<p>Great question!!</p>
<p>I can think of three excellent reasons to upgrade from a SolidWorks to a Catia-level modeler:</p>
<p>1. Major customers using Catia so you can design the tool with native product design files.</p>
<p>2. The need for advanced surfacing capabilities for draw die development to drive formability simulation and analysis.</p>
<p>3. Dies with large assemblies / high number of components.</p>
<p>I was tempted to add new employees with Catia experience over SolidWorks. But as Shane pointed out above, a Catia user can be up to speed on SolidWorks in less than a day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.dieguy.com/2010/05/01/solids-works/stephens/comment-page-1/#comment-295</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 May 2010 14:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dieguy.com/?p=745#comment-295</guid>
		<description>Tim,

What do you feel would be the catalyst for a business to &quot;upgrade&quot; to CATIA from an entry or mid-level CAD package (SolidWorks, VISI, etc.)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim,</p>
<p>What do you feel would be the catalyst for a business to &#8220;upgrade&#8221; to CATIA from an entry or mid-level CAD package (SolidWorks, VISI, etc.)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephens</title>
		<link>http://www.dieguy.com/2010/05/01/solids-works/stephens/comment-page-1/#comment-274</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 21:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dieguy.com/?p=745#comment-274</guid>
		<description>hi Shane!!

You are dead nuts on target with that ... thanks for the insights!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi Shane!!</p>
<p>You are dead nuts on target with that &#8230; thanks for the insights!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane Lien</title>
		<link>http://www.dieguy.com/2010/05/01/solids-works/stephens/comment-page-1/#comment-265</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane Lien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 11:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dieguy.com/?p=745#comment-265</guid>
		<description>I have spent several years designing tools in UG, Pro E and Solidworks. Solidworks is by far the best in my opinion. I great blend of power and user friendliness.

Shane Lien
West Marshland Tool Design</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have spent several years designing tools in UG, Pro E and Solidworks. Solidworks is by far the best in my opinion. I great blend of power and user friendliness.</p>
<p>Shane Lien<br />
West Marshland Tool Design</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephens</title>
		<link>http://www.dieguy.com/2010/05/01/solids-works/stephens/comment-page-1/#comment-251</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 10:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dieguy.com/?p=745#comment-251</guid>
		<description>hi there!

Thanks for reading my blog!!

I still cannot believe that some folks still use AutoCad - and I find it remarkable that some shops actually still design manually.

Thanks for validating 3D die design ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi there!</p>
<p>Thanks for reading my blog!!</p>
<p>I still cannot believe that some folks still use AutoCad &#8211; and I find it remarkable that some shops actually still design manually.</p>
<p>Thanks for validating 3D die design &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GrandVic Industries Corporation</title>
		<link>http://www.dieguy.com/2010/05/01/solids-works/stephens/comment-page-1/#comment-249</link>
		<dc:creator>GrandVic Industries Corporation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 07:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dieguy.com/?p=745#comment-249</guid>
		<description>Yup, Accurate is great company.  We got Solidworks and Logopress3 last year and they helped us out a lot with their guides, tutorials and videos!  3D die design is simply awesome; wished we had gone into 3D die design earlier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup, Accurate is great company.  We got Solidworks and Logopress3 last year and they helped us out a lot with their guides, tutorials and videos!  3D die design is simply awesome; wished we had gone into 3D die design earlier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

