<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bad Intentions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dieguy.com/2010/03/23/bad-intentions/stephens/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dieguy.com/2010/03/23/bad-intentions/stephens/</link>
	<description>Official Tim Stephens Website</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 07:22:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Honda recall list</title>
		<link>http://www.dieguy.com/2010/03/23/bad-intentions/stephens/comment-page-1/#comment-1241</link>
		<dc:creator>Honda recall list</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jun 2011 00:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dieguy.com/?p=584#comment-1241</guid>
		<description>would you like to swap links?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>would you like to swap links?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephens</title>
		<link>http://www.dieguy.com/2010/03/23/bad-intentions/stephens/comment-page-1/#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 16:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dieguy.com/?p=584#comment-77</guid>
		<description>Yes ... slap die concept.

It is not in any official die standards for a good reason: it is a bad concept even though it is functional.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes &#8230; slap die concept.</p>
<p>It is not in any official die standards for a good reason: it is a bad concept even though it is functional.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Kam</title>
		<link>http://www.dieguy.com/2010/03/23/bad-intentions/stephens/comment-page-1/#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Kam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 15:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dieguy.com/?p=584#comment-76</guid>
		<description>Tim,  with the upper die not attached to the RAM ? Is this similar to what an old &quot;die barber&quot; @GRFB called a &quot;slap punch&quot; set up. To save on Die Set up they used to mount Nitro between the upper Binder and Inner punch of the old double action. This way only the Binder had to be bolted up to the outer ram. The inner ram trailed behind and would catch up when the outer bottomed and &quot;slap&quot; the inner punch to finish the op. I don&#039;t recall that entry in the Die Standards but maybe this would be similar??

Then we could have more fun talking about the &quot;bad intentions&quot; of RubeGoldbergin the automation to reach in to your Fred Flintstone die.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim,  with the upper die not attached to the RAM ? Is this similar to what an old &#8220;die barber&#8221; @GRFB called a &#8220;slap punch&#8221; set up. To save on Die Set up they used to mount Nitro between the upper Binder and Inner punch of the old double action. This way only the Binder had to be bolted up to the outer ram. The inner ram trailed behind and would catch up when the outer bottomed and &#8220;slap&#8221; the inner punch to finish the op. I don&#8217;t recall that entry in the Die Standards but maybe this would be similar??</p>
<p>Then we could have more fun talking about the &#8220;bad intentions&#8221; of RubeGoldbergin the automation to reach in to your Fred Flintstone die.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

